Downey v. Instaloans Financial possibilities Centres McLennan Ross acted for the Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a payday lender, that has been solved included in the general settlement of this Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers. The settlement agreements had been approved because of the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.
Fong et al v. Calgary that is grenville-Germain Limited McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of a business which constructed an extravagance condominium/hotel/office complex within an action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for the transportation that is international with regards to an action involving a sizable travel facilitator therefore the incorporation of gas surcharges when you look at the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. a okay payday loans inc. et al This ended up being A uk Columbia course action against a quantity of cash advance operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three associated with the Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our customers.
Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel towards the auditors in this step, a вЂњrepresentative proceedingвЂќ before the utilization of course procedures legislation in Alberta, that has been brought with respect to payday loans Oklahoma most of the investors in 2 subsidiaries for the Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The matter had been settled just before exams for breakthrough.
Lahaie v. Goodyear it was a course action against Goodyear
McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The situation had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia up against the major operators when you look at the loan industry that is payday. McLennan Ross had been counsel to a single associated with Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a software for official official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this step as against our customers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this proposed course action, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national while the College of Chiropractors that one therapy ended up being harmful and really should never be allowed within the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a credit card applicatoin to really have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer prior to the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross had been involved with a course action brought by owners alleging any particular one for the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings set up which led to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation ended up being remedied by settlement between the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for just one regarding the Defendants in this course of action which desired an interpretation of this Insurance Act and a return of any deductible charged where there is a total lack of automobile under consideration. The action ended up being solved in preference of the Defendants after an overview dedication of the true point of legislation.
Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross had been counsel into the Plaintiffs in this putative course action which reported investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement aided by the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial possibilities Centres McLennan Ross had been counsel towards the Defendants in this class action brought against a loan that is payday into the Province of Alberta, that was settled within the general settlement for the Ontario and Alberta class procedures against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for just one associated with defendants in this class that is longstanding for several years.
1023926 Alberta Ltd. v. Bank of America et al Class actions have already been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and an amount of finance institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings on the part of Canadian merchants who accepted re re re re payment for items or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards regarding solution charges and limitations on company methods which were needed so that you can accept such repayments. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters associated with Defendant banking institutions. The things are susceptible to case that is coordinated consequently they are ongoing.
Alexander and Barrett v. HMS Financial et al McLennan Ross is co-counsel when it comes to Plaintiffs pertaining to a nationwide and cross-border course action alleging securities fraudulence. this course of action ended up being certified as against many specific and business Defendants, including major finance institutions. We now have restored a few million bucks for the course users.
Bird v. Blott & Associates et al McLennan Ross is representing one of several Defendants in this proposed course action with respect to an amount of domestic college claimants. We now have simply filed A declaration of Defence while the action have not yet been certified.
Covidien LLC McLennan Ross is representing Covidien LLC in 2 course actions brought by people who had urinary mesh implanted. Covidien is the one supplier (amongst many named manufacturers and suppliers) of the item in Canada. The litigation mirrors comparable class actions brought in the usa.
L’Hirondelle v Medicentres An $11 million course action lawsuit happens to be filed more than a lacking laptop containing individual and wellness information of 620,000 Albertans. The lawsuit alleges Medicentres neglected to protect personal information and had been negligent in taking a lot more than four months to see the general public in regards to the privacy breach. McLennan Ross is counsel towards the IT consulting firm, whom employed the IT consultant whom owned the laptop that is missing.
Phillips and Wournell v. Image (Topco) companies Limited et al This proposed class proceeding in British Columbia, pertaining to the Tracy action below, is brought against people and entities alleging conveyance that is fraudulent of relating to the ongoing Tracy payday advances course proceeding. Defence for this action is ongoing.
Poseidon Concepts Corp. McLennan Ross is lead counsel to your auditors of Poseidon Concepts Corp. (Poseidon) in a shareholder course action claim in Alberta for $650 million, along with associated actions filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and nyc. The events mixed up in different disputes, aside from the Plaintiff investors, include: Poseidon through its Monitor, Underwriters, a Lending Syndicate of chartered banking institutions, a predecessor general public firm, while the directors and officers of Poseidon.
Tracy v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross is counsel into the Defendants in course action procedures into the Province of British Columbia. The course action alleges that the Defendant payday loan providers had been operated unlawfully and claims damages when you look at the tens of huge amount of money. Defence regarding the proceeding continues subsequent to its official official official official certification as a course action.